A year ago I had the
great pleasure of working with the leadership team of a small, progressively
run, manufacturing company. The following is from an email response to a final
assessment I requested from the CEO.
The primary goal, set
early in my preliminary work with the CEO, was to open and facilitate
communication between the four men on the leadership team. Our conversations
primarily revolved around improved communication flow and efficiency. Once
established and practiced by the leadership team the hope was that it would
“spill over” into the way communication was handled in the workplace in general.
We identified this workplace as a good place to work and do business, with a
great product and an efficient system of production and delivery. It was a good
company that wanted to be better.
To the CEO the most
difficult aspect of running the workplace had become the varying interpersonal
styles of those involved. He was frustrated by how different personalities meshed
and created friction, impacting productivity and morale. The CEO ( who
preferred to remain anonymous for this presentation of our work together) often
repeated that he felt very competent in running the business end of the
operation, and he felt he had an excellent crew, but he felt out of his element
and his ability to be patient when it came to the interpersonal aspects of
problem-solving and interacting with his partners and workers.
This is a family-owned
and run business, and the size of the workforce is also family-sized, so our
discussions often revolved around how family systems and small business systems
function similarly. It was made clear that the stress was on a self-improvement
strategy and NOT therapy. We worked on educating and empowering the leadership
team in ways to self-identify communication styles and how to more seamlessly
interact with those who have different ways of communication. We discussed
identifying how people inadvertently bring their own family roles into the
workplace, particularly in the unavoidable periods of increased stress and duress.
Basic systems theory as well as psycho-education about communication styles was
provided and integrated into our sessions to assist in making each person
responsible for self- identifying potential friction points. In this way each
person in the operation could become more adept at facilitating less problematic
communication in the shop as well as implementing ways to fold in
acknowledgement and incentive at all levels of the operation.
Another result of our
work was a more fine-tuned tool to define roles and job descriptions in all
levels of the operation. This was helpful in maintaining the informal and essentially
non-hierarchical nature of the vision the owners had about how their shop
should function by reinforcing and defining limits of roles and how they
interfaced and overlapped in the day-to-day functioning of the workplace. The
concrete result was a more practical and less subjective way of measuring
on-the-job performance and expectation.
The aspect of this work
that was most satisfying, I think, was the degree of self-motivation and pride
I witnessed over the course of the year I worked with this company. I was also
proud to work for a leadership team that was so concerned with the whole-person
well-being of its workers. In spite of the CEO’s concern about his own feelings
of inadequacy in dealing with the interpersonal aspects of his company, his
desire was clearly focused on making his shop a pleasant and productive place
to work where everyone could feel like a productive and important part of the
whole operation.
“Bob--
-
As a direct result of working with you I have a much better understanding of my
own personal communication style and how it can positively and/or negatively
affect the success/outcome of any communication. My personal
communication style has changed some… it may have become even a bit more
direct as before, but also a bit more calculated and with a different tone if
possible and appropriate.
-
By the way, “YES” our first annual, formal and documented performance reviews
were conducted as a direct result of our working together. It seemed to
be the best way to convey to our employees that management believes that poor
communication is a problem at our company and often the root cause of
interpersonal relationship issues and conflicts. Though it took
most employees by surprise, when presented with specific instances and
examples, I think they kind of got the point. Furthermore, I can definitely
see a significant improvement in everyone’s efforts to communicate more/better.
-
The biggest most positive change by far, I see in my brother [a co-owner of the business and a co-member
of leadership and ownership team]. Not necessarily from a communication
standpoint but more on a personal level. He appears to be more actively
engaged and interested in being part of the company’s ownership team and seems
to have grasped the concept that as long as he does something productive he
feels better about himself and as part of our operation. (Priceless)
We
will continue to monitor and evaluate communication and will definitely call
upon your services if we deem it necessary to take additional steps to improve
communication within our plant or if poor communication continues to lead to
problem situations.
Thanks
and Kind Regards…..”
2 comments:
It sounds like you did an excellent job! This might be well suited to go out iin a flyer or an email to your mailing list.
Post a Comment